Who in their right mind would trust WHO?
Governments operate like a smooth smiling magician, they create illusions to distract, beguile and deceive and then become wealthy by stealing your wealth. Snake oil salesmen in bed with Big Business.
In spite of being largely funded by vaccine maniac Bill Gates and possessing all the hallmarks of a Criminal Cartel, The World Health Organisation has politically engineered events to the point where they now have sufficient power to force democratically elected national governments to impose martial law, change national law, impose lockdowns, vaccinations by force, and imprison those who refuse. All thanks to complicit governments having signed treaties that betray their own people. Like so much else our governments do in our name, i.e. enforced mass immigration etc, no one voted for this, or would, if they were given a choice. As Mark Twain once so accurately stated: “If voting made any difference they wouldn't let us do it.”
Thankfully the chain of custody documentation used by governments world-wide includes data showing that in the World Health Organisations founding documents have from the outset included caveats that gave them legal exemption from all criminal prosecution, and of any kind whatsoever:
“The Representatives of members at meetings convened by a specialised agency shall, while exercising their functions and during their journeys to and from the place of meeting, enjoy the following privileges and immunities: (a) Immunity from personal arrest or detention and from seizure of their personal baggage, and in respect of words spoken or written and all acts done by them in their official capacity, immunity from legal process of every kind;”
Ref: https://apps.who.int/gb/bd/pdf_files/BD_49th-en.pdf#page-34
Ask yourself this question: why would an organisation need to give itself exemption from all criminal prosecution? Not just Civil prosecution, but specifically criminal prosecution? Exemptions that also prohibit any investigations into WHO’s misdeeds. Such as criminal actions for mass vaccination programs, that alone have already killed millions and left many millions more incapacitated from related illnesses. It’s no coincidence that in the UK alone, since the vaccine rollout claims for long term benefits, (due to vaccine related illnesses) have more than doubled. For those even less fortunate, as discussed in Part Two, the excess death rates in most countries are far exceeding anything that could be considered normal. In Europe for example there has been a sharp increase in excess deaths, i.e. Ireland, almost +30 per cent, Germany +37.3 per cent, Austria by +27.4 per cent, and in Slovenia +25.9 per cent, and so on.
But WHO have given themselves criminal exemptions that even apply to anyone working within this highly suspect organisation. Now if that’s not a criminal’s charter to cause harm and get away with it - then what is it? The reason the World Health Organisation wrote this into their founding documentation was because they knew they were already breaking the law.
Ref: https://www.bitchute.com/video/LEcz4kpFDz6S/
In his YouTube video entitled ‘International Excess Deaths, published on June 11,’ Dr John Campbell says, tongue in cheek: "It's a pity we don't have an organisation that's responsible for global health, because if we did, they'd be absolutely bouncing up and down about this, and saying 'what is killing our people?
Why would an organisation founded on health and welfare need to give itself exemption from all criminal prosecution? My thanks to ‘The Light’ newspaper for their great work and excerpts taken from the following article:
“Through a series of amendments and a pandemic preparedness treaty, the World Health Organisation is seeking to gain authority over the health decisions of all nations on Earth. Gaining powers to be triggered in the event of another covid-like pandemic, thus empowering the WHO to force countries to lock down and close businesses, schools, pubs and churches. We would also be forced to take an injection, whether we want to or not, forced to wear masks, or whatever they tell us to do. We have never before seen this level of authority given to an international, unelected body. The WHO say it is necessary to protect the world's population, even if it means restricting some of our liberties.
Dr Abdullah Assiri, who co-chairs the Working Group on International Health Regulations (WGIHR), said: "The world requires a different level of legal mandates, such as the pandemic treaty, to navigate through a particular pandemic, should one occur, and it will. Prioritising actions that may restrict individual liberties, mandating and sharing of information, knowledge and resources • pandemic control efforts, are all necessary during a pandemic."
Dechen Wangmo, Bhutan's Health Minister agreed: "Let us seize this opportunity to foster international collaboration, ensure global health security and protect the lives and the well-being of all people beyond boundaries.” The United Nations are pushing for the same goal, saying speed is of the essence. U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra, conveyed the urgency: I wish to stress from our perspective, the quicker we can come together, the sooner we will all be safe.
"We know that the challenges we face won't be solved by a few leaders or a few countries, but by the world coming together and fighting for what's right.”
In the UK, despite overwhelming public opposition, only a handful of MPs have voiced opposition to this dangerously undemocratic move. The UN is being underhand by not calling this a treaty, which would require Parliamentary scrutiny, but describes this power grab as an ‘accord' so there is no need for debate. A clever coup brought about by an unaccountable, supra-governmental organisation able to order businesses to shut and inject people with dangerous products against their will.
Supporters of WHO’s 'accord' say critics worry too much, and that nations won't really lose sovereignty, but it remains to be seen how powerful the WHO, which started as an advisory body, intend to become, after the emergency powers are granted. https://tinyurl.com/mrpr4x5p - https://tinyurl.com/ms92z3yy
And who in their right mind would trust the worlds’ leading experts on vaccines?
One good thing to have come from the Covid vaccine rollout is many more people have become aware of how little safety testing applies when it come to vaccines, and that death or serious health problems caused by vaccine contents can no longer be denied. In other words, for once the public got a glimpse of how the sausage is made.
The following shows how under oath our so-called experts show themselves to be incompetent, reckless liars, and should have been put behind bars years ago. We will take just two examples, Dr Stanley Plotkin who wrote the textbook on vaccines, and Dr Kathryn Edwards, another world leading vaccine consultant, and co-author to Plotkin’s book. She is also one of the vaccine industry’s senior advisors, including the Covid 19 vaccine rollout.
As you will see, when testifying under oath, both are shown to be criminally liable with regard to autism and many other vaccine related life changing reactions. Aaron Siri is the specialist lawyer doing the interrogating, and any right-minded person will be shocked after reading what these two are forced admit when under oath.
In addition to the World Health Organisation exempting themselves from the onset of any criminal liability, in 1986 The National Childhood Injury Act also removed all liability from multiple vaccine manufactures. The reason being that following court actions for related vaccine deaths and injuries, litigation costs associated with claims of damage from vaccines had forced several companies to stop producing licensed vaccines. No other product has ever been given such freedom from prosecution - a licence to maim and kill no less.
There is no such thing as a pharmaceutical product that does not injure somebody, in the same way there are no safe levels of highly toxic aluminium and mercury, included in most vaccines, and why in spite of their tactics billions are still being paid out following multiple ongoing lawsuits. Such as the $4.85 billion Merck & Co agreed to pay after it was shown its painkiller ‘Vioxx’ had caused heart attacks and strokes in thousands of users. The Pfizer payout of $2.3 billion to resolve criminal and civil allegations after Pfizer was found to to have illegally promoted the use of four of its drugs.
Just two examples, and why after the 1986 exemption from vaccine damage liability, the vaccine industry became a highly lucrative goldmine. But at what cost? By 1986, most children were given just 3 routine childhood vaccines: DTP, MMR, & OPV, and perhaps up to 10 vaccines in total. But soon after all legal liability was removed in 1986, the number of vaccines administered to children jumped to a staggering 72 - none of which needed to be tested for safety. Why would they? All liability for related deaths, brain-damage, paralysis or other serious illness were removed by Government. Unlike the drug market, now investors had the perfect product, in that it does not have to be tested for safety.
There are also no advertising expenses. The government is forcing this toxic product on every child, year in year out, and in multiple doses. Is it any wonder that vaccines have grown to be the biggest money-spinning racket in the pharmaceutical business? In spite of the escalation of serious vaccine damage being reported, such as autism and other neurological conditions coinciding with the vaccine rollouts, babies are still being systematically poisoned from birth onwards. See Vaccine related Autism & Dementia in Part Five.
Drug Trials by definition will require sufficient time to observe any adverse reactive health issues, but notice below how the Vaccine Safety Review Periods are totally insufficient to observe many pathological reactions, such as autoimmune conditions, and/or brain damage, not to mention the absence of adequate control groups.
A control group is a group in the experiment which a variable is not being tested, such as a test subject that does not receive any treatment. Control groups serve as important benchmarks to compare the results of the experimental group, or the group that is being experimented on; but this has never occurred with regard to vaccines. Which raises the question, why are vaccine trial periods restricted to such a short time window? Answer: to hide all related symptoms as much as possible. Without placebos there is no way to prove causation, and that’s the whole point.
Hep-B (Merck) 5 day Safety Period and No Controls (Hep B)
IPV (Sanofi) 3 day Safety Period and No Controls (Inactivated poliovirus)
Hib (Merck) 5 day Safety Period and No Controls (Hoemophilus influenzae type b)
DTaP (GSK) 28 day Safety Period & DTP Control Group (Diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis)
PCV13 (Pfizer) 6 months Safety Period and PCV7 Control Group (Pneumococcal conjugate)
As discussed in Parts 5 many vaccine reactions are ongoing and life changing. For example, in addition to diabetes, autism, autoimmune issues such as asthma and bowel issues, etc, speech delay is one of the many neurological problems caused by vaccine toxicity, therefore how can this be detected when safety trials have been rigged to allow only days?
The Hepatitis B vaccine is injected into babies within their first 24 hours of life. The safety test for this product consisted of three clinical studies, when 434 doses of RECOMBIVAX HB, 5 mcg, were administered to 147 healthy infants and children (up to 10 years of age), after which they were monitored for only 5 days. The first thing to be noted is there were no placebo group, then the small number of children included in the trials. Furthermore none were newborns, and all the children had to be healthy to be included. In other words, all would have developed some degree of natural immunity.
Newborn infants are not born with robust immunity and at one day old are far more vulnerable to vaccine toxicity. See Cot deaths & Autism in Part Five. Ask yourself this: would you allow any of your children to take a combination of toxic drugs that had only been tested for 5 days? Would the fact that the people manufacturing the untested drugs were exempt from liability for any permanent harm caused, give you confidence in those peddling it? This has been standard practice in the *United States for every newborn for decades and perhaps explains why more babies die in their first day of life in America than all other industrialised countries combined. A death rate that demonstrates what happens when Big Pharma gets a grip on a Nation. *Most other countries follow similar procedures, i.e. some form of vaccination is given soon after birth, and then at regular intervals thereafter, throughout all their developing years.
Think about it, with regard to the Hep B jab, why would a baby less than one day old require protection from a sexually transmitted disease that usually only occurs after multiple partners, prostitution, or from sharing heroin needles? When asked what has caused such a phenomenal escalation of autism, the medical profession openly confess they do not know. However, in spite of their ignorance, and no evidence to back it up, they remain certain autism has nothing to do with infant routine vaccinations.
There are thousands and thousands of parents who firmly believe otherwise, based on the fact their children were alive or developing normally until shortly after receiving ‘safe and effective’ routine vaccinations. In fact depending on the individual study, between 40% and 70% of autistic parents blame vaccinations for their child’s autism.
When asked to specify which vaccines the parents thought responsible, the following were the most consistently blamed; The Hepatitis B vaccine, given three times before 6 months old, the Diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis (DTaP), Inactivated poliovirus (IPV), Pneumococcal conjugate (PCV13) and measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccines.
A whole decade before Dr Andrew Wakefield exposed the link between the MMR, related bowel damage and autism; and for which he was castigated, as the photocopy below shows, as far back as 1986, the US Government were made aware of the ten most commonly claimed injuries caused by adverse vaccine reactions, including autism. Not least because autism was one of the most claimed injuries, strongly indicating susceptibility to brain damage in some children; but still The World Health Organisation has done nothing, such as investigate or intervene. Why?
Note the damning conclusion from a U.S. House Report June 2000: "The overwhelming majority of members, both voting members and consultants, have substantial ties to the pharmaceutical industry.” Also in December 2009, the HHS Inspector General found the, "CDC had a systemic lack of oversight of the ethics program,” including finding that 58% of [committee members] had potential conflicts of interest that CDC did not identify" and "32 percent ... had potential conflicts of interests that CDC identified, but did not resolve."
Condemned by their own testimony
As mentioned at the outset, Dr Stanley Plotkin is the man who Bill Gates describes his textbook as, “The Bible for Vaccinologists,” prompting Dr Plotkin to respond by saying he hoped his book was more reliable than the Bible. But as will become evident in the following, when fools are given credibility they become a liability. Because despite his clear lack of concern for public safety and glaring failure to recognise significant danger signals, Plotkin remains the leading voice on vaccines around the world. Not to mention being on almost every vaccine company’s board of directors; who together with Dr Kathryn Edwards, another world leading vaccine consultant, and co-author to Plotkin’s book is also one of the vaccine industry’s senior advisors, including for the Covid 19 vaccine rollout. And who also, when testifying under oath, is shown to be criminally negligent with regard to autism and many other vaccine-related life-changing adverse reactions.
The following is taken from testimonies given under oath and includes testimony regarding Hepatitis B vaccine safety measures administered to all babies within their first 24 hours of life and other vaccines.
Lawyer Mr Siri asks: “Is five days long enough to detect an autoimmune issue that arises?”
Dr Plotkin: “No”
Mr Siri asks: “Is five days long enough to detect any neurological disorder that arose from the vaccine?”
Dr Plotkin: “No”
Mr Siri: “There is no control group? Correct?
Holding the Safety Trial document, Dr Plotkin responds: “It does not mention any control group. No”
Now Mr Siri asks: “Under immune system disorders, does it say there were reports of hypersensitive reactions, including anaphylactic reactions, bronchial spasms, and urticaria (red welts on the skin sometimes with dangerous swelling, caused by an allergic reaction) being reported after the first few hours of receiving the vaccination?
Dr Plotkin: “Yes”
Mr Siri continues: “And reports of Hypersensitivity Syndrome?”
Dr Plotkin: “Yes, that’s what it states”
Mr Siri: “Reports of arthritis?”
Dr Plotkin: “Um yes, it is mentioned”
Mr Siri: “It also reports autoimmune diseases including Systemic Lupus Arythmatosis (an autoimmune disease in which the immune system attacks its own tissues, causing widespread inflammation and tissue damage in the affected organs). Lupus-like syndromes, and vasculitis….Correct?”
Dr Plotkin: “Yes, that’s what it states”
Mr Siri: “Also it states under nervous system disorders, that there are reports of Guillain-Barre syndrome?” (When an infant’s immune system attacks the body’s peripheral nerves)….Correct?”
Dr Plotkin: “Yes”
Mr Siri continues: “As well as multiple sclerosis, exacerbation of multiple sclerosis, myelitis, including transverse myelitis, (Transverse myelitis is when both sides of the spinal cord become inflamed, a neurological disorder that often damages the insulating material covering nerve cell that in turn interrupts the messages that the spinal cord nerves communicate)….seizures, febrile seizures, peripheral neuropathy including bells palsy, radiculopathy (peripheral nerve damage), muscle weakness, hyperesthesia and encephalitis (brain swelling)…is that correct?”
Dr Plotkin: “Correct”
Mr Siri: “These are events reported after vaccination and we have just discussed, in order to establish whether it’s causal between the vaccine, and the condition you would need a randomised-placebo-controlled study”
Dr Plotkin nod’s in agreement and confirms: “Yes”
Mr Siri: “That was not done for the Hepatits B Vaccine before licensure, was it?
Dr Plotkin: “No”
As mentioned, no vaccines have been double-blind placebo safety tested; perhaps this would probably explain why children have more physical and mental health issues today than any previous generation. Take note of what the typical vaccine ingredients contain: Thimerosal (mercury), Aluminium salts, formaldehyde, aborted human cells and tissue, human serum albumin, diploid human cell, and human embryonic kidney cells, bizarre animal cells from monkeys, cows, pigs and chickens, “human fetus cells lines” foetal tongue tissue, as well as “African Green Monkey kidney pus cells” harvested from diseased primates, ingredients derived from GMOs, the radioactive element barium, artificial colouring chemicals, chemical cleansing agents, dangerous bacterial strains such as E.coli, toxic chemicals such as glutaraldehyde, excitotoxins such as glutamate, (See Glutamate Autism and Dementia ) and much more.
No one can refute this, because it’s admitted by the CDC itself - but why aborted baby parts? The scientists claim that it was only one baby in the 1960s that was ever used, so let’s see how Dr Plotkin deals with this subject:
Mr Siri: “In your work in relation to vaccines, how many foetus’s have been part of that work?”
Dr Plotkin: “My own personal work, two”
Mr Siri hands Plotkin a document requesting him to note exhibit 41: “Are you familiar with this article Dr Plotkin?”
Dr Plotkin: “Yes”
Mr Siri: “Are you listed as an author in this article Dr Plotkin?
Dr Plotkin: “Yes”
Mr Siri: “This study took place at the Wistar Institute, correct?”
Dr Plotkin: “Yes”
Mr Siri: “How many foetuses does it say were used in this study?”
Dr Plotkin: “Uh quite a few”
Mr Siri: “This study involved 74 foetuses correct?”
Dr Plotkin: “Oh I don’t remember exactly how many”
Mr Siri: “Please turn to page 12 of the study”
Dr Plotkin: “Oh yeah, 76”
Mr Siri: “And all these foetuses, were 3 months or older, normally developing foetuses when aborted, is that correct?”
Dr Plotkin: “Yes”
Mr Siri: “I am going to ask you again, in your entire career how many foetuses have you worked with?"
Dr Plotkin: “I don’t remember the exact number, but quite a few”
But certainly many more that two as first claimed. Mr Siri concludes: “Are you an atheist?”…….Dr Plotkin: “Yes” So much for the diligence and integrity of the World’s leading authority on vaccines.
Now to Dr Kathryn Edwards, Principal Investigator, Clinical Immunisation Safety Assessment (CISA) Project. Member of the Data Safety Monitoring Board for Pfizer's COVID-19 Vaccine Trials, and Co-Author, 'Plotkin's Vaccines.’ She is considered to be the 2nd or 3rd World leading vaccine authority; therefore pay close attention to what she has to say when forced to defend herself under oath in a case specifically relating to vaccine damage and autism.
Mr Siri: “According to your profile…you are highly experienced at clinical trials, is that correct?”
Dr Edwards: “I am highly experienced at clinical trials”
Mr Siri: “And you are familiar with the many clinical trials relied upon to license many of the vaccines currently on the market, correct?”
Dr Edwards: “I am”
Mr Siri: “In your opinion did the subsequent clinical trials relied upon to licence these vaccines, many of which are still on the market today,…. were they designed to rule out that the vaccine causes autism?”
Dr Edwards: “No”
Mr Siri: “In document disclosures for this case it asserts that you will testify, and I quote, “The issue of whether vaccines causes autism has been thoroughly researched and rejected.”
Mr Siri continues: “It is your testimony that MMR vaccine cannot cause autism?”
Dr Edwards: “That’s correct”
Mr Siri: “It is your testimony the Hep B vaccine cannot cause autism?”
Dr Edwards: “That’s correct”
Mr Siri: “It is your testimony the IPV vaccine cannot cause autism?”
Dr Edwards: “Yes”
Mr Siri: “It is your testimony the Hib vaccine cannot cause autism?”
Dr Edwards: “Yes”
Mr Siri: “It is your testimony the Varicella vaccine cannot cause autism?”
Dr Edwards: “Yes”
Mr Siri: “It is your testimony the Prevnar vaccine cannot cause autism?”
Dr Edwards: “Yes”
Mr Siri: “It is your testimony the DTaP vaccine cannot cause autism?”
Dr Edwards: “Yes”
Mr Siri: “And do you have a study that supports DTaP vaccine doesn’t cause autism?”
Dr Edwards: “I do not”
Mr Siri: “Do you have any studies that supports IPV vaccine doesn’t cause autism?”
Dr Edwards: “No I do not Sir”
Mr Siri: “Do you have any studies one way or the other with regard to engerix b vaccine causing autism?”
Dr Edwards: “I do not have any evidence that it causes autism, or that it does not”
Mr Siri continues his list to give her a chance to provide any proof that would substantiate Dr Edwards’ claim; “vaccines cannot cause autism.” But no such proof or evidence was forthcoming. The video goes on to show that in Dr Edwards’ capacity as one of the vaccine industries senior advisors, working the Covid 19 vaccine rollout, she could not escape the charge, like many other Covid ‘experts’, who have been found to have a financial conflict of interest, i.e. either they worked for, or had shares in the related pharmaceutical company.
Mr Siri: “Isn't it true that directly before becoming a member of the independent Data Safety Monitor Board of the Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine, you were an employed as advisor to Pfizer? “Dr Edwards responds, “Yes Sir” and attempts to insist that there was no financial conflict of interest. Keep in mind Dr Edwards’ was also key in getting the covid vaccine quickly rolled out in time for ‘Operation Warp Speed.’
Video Ref: https://www.bitchute.com/video/UPRyzkH5cGrL/
As researcher and author Dr. Suzanne Humphries, MD., admits in the following part: “I was once a medical professional who would have said that ‘the vaccination science was settled long ago, and is now laid to rest’. After all, that is what I was taught. But after my experience in the hospital system and thoroughly examining the medical literature, it became obvious that most medical professionals who parrot such statements have read almost nothing on vaccination and are just following orders. I know, because this was also formerly true of me.
Vaccine contents, the dangers, effectiveness or necessity of vaccines is not taught in medical schools. I’ve yet to meet a paediatrician who understands both sides of the debate enough to give fully informed consent. Many doctors don’t even understand the vaccine inserts, or know what is in vaccines.”
Despite very little press coverage, the Federal court finds the US Government’s actions in “direct violation of the 1st amendment.” “Even the President wanted complete censorship of any views contrary to the government narrative.”………Guilty of “illicit coercion;”
For the first time in American history District and Federal court judges unanimously found the US Government’s actions to be in “direct violation of the 1st amendment.” In a landmark case ‘Missouri verses Biden’ concerning 1st Amendment Law, a Federal Appellate court on September 8th 2023 found that multiple bodies, i.e. from the President himself, White House staff, the surgeon general, the FBI, the CDC, and many more were all guilty of “illicit coercion;” and of “significant encouragement,” i.e. to those who were supporting the government line. They found that Government officials had repeatedly and successfully lobbied major social media companies, in order “to remove all disfavoured content and accounts from their sites.” The court also found the government deliberately suppressed any views they deemed as “misinformation,” i.e. any views that didn’t agree with its stance on contentious topics like the COVID-19 lab-leak theory and the efficacy of pandemic lockdowns, mask mandates, and health damage caused by government approved vaccines.
Documents and records show that White House officials were sending e-mails and communications to sympathetic news media outlets and social media companies. Even the President wanted complete censorship of any views contrary to the government narrative. The court found that over a period of years the White House held meetings on a regular basis with leaders of social media companies in order to demand that any speech the government did not like was taken down, while at the same time demanding the same social media companies amplify all ‘official’ propaganda. The Judicial hearing also exposed how the government used multiple intermediaries, such as numerous platforms belonging to sympathetic non-governmental organisations (NGO’s).
In addition, the court condemned the ongoing policy of removing any parental content expressing concerns about Covid vaccine related health risks or the serious health damage to children, adults and deaths following the Covid injections, or any content questioning the wearing of masks, or any views contrary to the government line. In other words, the American government has been found guilty of collusion, in order to prevent free speech and to actively promote a government false narrative, much of which has since been proven to be lies. In summary, these were deliberate acts of “coerced censorship” by numerous platforms since early 2021, and part of internal Federal government policy, i.e. a well planned and coordinated conspiracy from the President down in order to deny the American people their 1st Amendment right to free speech.
As one would expect, the Appeal court placed an injunction on the White House with immediate effect. Naturally the White House appealed, but thankfully a 5th Circuit Court has upheld the Missouri court decision.
Like America, this has also been happening in the UK, but not only have numerous useful and informative websites been shut down, deemed as ‘misinformation’ many thousands with opposing views are even having their bank accounts closed by government colluding banks, thus forcing many out of business. Nigel Farage being the most obvious example, and all for no other reason than questioning the government narrative. Similar tactics were also used, together with fear when the British government attempted to prevent ‘Brexit’ happening.
Remember to show yourselves as men: Isaiah 46:8
Of Britains 650 MPs, only one has shown any courage and spoken up about Covid vaccine related risks, and was immediately expelled from the ‘people’s’ Parliament for doing so. MP for North West Leicestershire Andrew Bridgen was quickly stripped of the Tory whip and subsequently expelled from the Conservative Party after raising concerns about the Covid vaccine and related potential health risks. He said the Covid vaccines were the “biggest crime against humanity since the Holocaust.”
In a statement following his expulsion he said: “My expulsion from the Conservative Party is under false pretences and only confirms the culture of corruption, collusion, and cover-ups which plagues our political system. I have been a vocal critic of the vaccine rollout, and the party have been sure to make an example of me. I am grateful for my new-found freedom and will continue to fight for justice for all those harmed, injured, and bereaved due to governmental incompetence.” Since being removed from the Conservative Party the MP has vowed to fight the next election regardless. “I will continue to serve my constituents as I was elected to do, and intend to stand again at the next election.”
Laurence Fox, from Britain’s new Reclaim Party called the MP a “hero” for asking “entirely justified questions” about the vaccine, and said his party would “take anybody” who believes that “without free speech you don’t live in a democracy,” Mr Fox also told The Telegraph: “It’s an absolute crying shame that a party that defends free speech actually needs to exist in a world where a Conservative Party should be the ones protecting it. Every parliamentarian of every political persuasion should be behind Andrew Bridgen to the hilt. It’s appalling that they’re not.”
Speaking to GB News, Andrew Bridgen said: “It’s deeply upsetting to be expelled from a party I’ve served for several decades and campaigned hard for, but I barely recognise the Conservative Party at the moment. “I put it to you there was no one else speaking out. And if that’s cost me my political career then so be it, quite honestly, because if I’ve saved the life or one child from being injured, that’s worth it, isn't it?”
As shown in Part Two, 95% of all excess deaths were the people who had trustingly received Covid Vaccinations. The following are extracts taken from ‘The Light’ newspaper’ and includes the latest mortality data taken from UK government’s own database. It shows clearly that in spite of being castigated and left isolated, Andrew Bridgen was right to raise concerns regarding Covid vaccines and public safety. Data that heaps damnation on the other 650 tax-funded parasitic, gutless Members of Parliament who have the audacity to call themselves representatives of the British people.
To re-quote The British Heart Foundation: “…such a significant number of excess deaths could not be explained by covid-19 alone…..we are calling on the UK Government to take charge of the increasingly urgent cardiovascular disease crisis.”
But this will never happen, primarily because of governmental criminal complicity, therefore the time has come to demand the setting up of independent ‘Peoples’ Courts’ and the return of capital punishment for treason, murder and genocide. Such as Middle East Wars based on non-existent Weapons of Mass Destruction. Together with urgent investigation into the infiltration of secret societies and brotherhood networks, i.e. freemasonry that has infiltrated all government levels and departments. One reason being that they are sworn on pain of death never to testify against another or reveal their secrets (See Part Six). Many High Court Judges should also go trial, not least for continually ruling in favour of Europe over their own countrymens wishes, such as using EU law to overrule all attempts to put the brakes on runaway third world immigration, and who habitually pass laws that favour the criminal over the victim, thus perpetuating social breakdown and keeping the masses fearful.
As Andrew Bridgen confirmed, the entire UK establishment has succumbed to “a culture of corruption, collusion, and cover-ups that plagues our political system.” A cosy elite that ruthlessly exploit their own people, start bankers wars, crash the economy and broker Big Business deals that have left many bankrupt, impoverished, forcing many to live rough. All the while lining their own pockets. Therefore without serious action those responsible will never let themselves be scrutinised. In other words, only by people taking back control will government and its establishment ever be held to account by the people they have consistently cheated and lied to.
An establishment who hold in contempt those who they pretend to serve, as demonstrated by an empty House of Parliament during a debate concerning Covid vaccine related serious health issues and escalation of excess deaths. As mentioned above, only one of Britains 650 MPs had the guts to go against the ‘freemason dominated’ establishment line. After which he was immediately expelled from the ‘people’s’ Parliament. As far as the ruling elite are concerned, we represent the ignorant masses, just cattle to be exploited and herded. But never forget, we the people are the sleeping giant they are terrified of waking.